On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:22:31 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote: > > I gave it a try: > - Remove existing alignment attributes from some device_id types > - Introduce kernel_* types with proper size and alignment for > cross-compilation (sample <asm/kerneltypes.h> for m68k included) > - Introduce BITS_PER_KERNEL_LONG, to make it clearer it applies to the target > > Apart from a cross-compile session for m68k, it's untested. > This still requires a bit of maintenance to set up a kerneltypes.h for every arch. It also means we have to be very careful that gcc's internal alignment settings matched the ones in our header. Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- m68k build failure
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: m68k build failure
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build failure)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- m68k build failure
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] random: make backtracking attacks harder
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/6] random: step more rapidly through the pool when adding and extracting
- Previous by thread: Re: Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build failure)
- Next by thread: Re: Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build failure)
- Index(es):
 |