On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 21:33 +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Which problems? I did not see any special things, it looked rather
> straight forward. What have I overlooked?
On suspend it locks the whole device tree, this means it has 'unbounded'
nesting and holds an 'unbounded' number of locks. Neither things are
easy to annotate (remember that mutex_lock_nested can handle up to 8
nestings and current->held_locks has a max of 30).
In fact, converting this will be the hardest part, it would require
reworking the locking and introduction of a hard limit on the device
tree depth - this might upset some people, but I suspect that 16 or 24
should be deep enough for pretty much anything. Of course, if people
prove me wrong, I'll have to reconsider. The up-side of the locking
scheme I'm thinking of will be that locking the whole tree will only
take 'depth' number of opterations vs the total number of tree elements.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
