On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:06 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 18:11 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > It must be the locking in __driver_attach(), taking dev->parent->sem
> > > then taking dev->sem .. Assuming those are different structures, why
> > > does lockdep trigger?
> >
> > They aren't different, parent is a struct device again.
>
> It's different memory tho .. I wasn't sure how to term that .. The locks
> are in two different memory location so it couldn't be recursive .. I'm
> only asking for my own understanding .. I don't mind inspecting
> potentially bad locking ..
Yeah, it are different lock instances, however by virtue of sharing the
same lock init site, they belong to the same lock class. Lockdep works
by tracking class dependancies, not instance dependancies.
By generalizing to classes it can detect locking errors before they
actually occur.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
