Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]

On Dec 8, 2007 3:11 PM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Parag Warudkar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > But there are still fluctuations under 100% idle -
>
> do you have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y?

Yes - NO_HZ=y  and HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y.
My ssh connection still died with hpet=disable although this time I
did not see soft lockup message.
Also it randomly gets stuck - suddenly there is a freeze and I can't
type for seconds.

> these fluctuations would still be OK if they are due to HZ granularity.
>

So are the hpet ones ok too or do they seem off even with HRTIMERS=y?
Just trying to figure out if I should be testing further with hpet
disabled or enabling it is ok.

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
  • Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] Unionfs: reduce the amount of cache-coherency debugging messages
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
• Previous by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
• Next by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]