On Dec 8, 2007 3:11 PM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Parag Warudkar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But there are still fluctuations under 100% idle - > > do you have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y? Yes - NO_HZ=y and HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y. My ssh connection still died with hpet=disable although this time I did not see soft lockup message. Also it randomly gets stuck - suddenly there is a freeze and I can't type for seconds. > these fluctuations would still be OK if they are due to HZ granularity. > So are the hpet ones ok too or do they seem off even with HRTIMERS=y? Just trying to figure out if I should be testing further with hpet disabled or enabling it is ok. Parag -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- References:
- RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] Unionfs: reduce the amount of cache-coherency debugging messages
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- Previous by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Next by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Index(es):
 |