* Parag Warudkar <[email protected]> wrote: > > while :; do time usleep 1111111; done > > > > or do these sleeps fluctuate? > > They seem to fluctuate - not sure if that's supposed to be exact or if > below variations are normal - This is when my compiles are running - it's normal for them to fluctuate a little when load goes up and the task gets delayed. 'bad' fluctuations are ones that happen when the system is idle. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- References:
- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- From: "Parag Warudkar" <[email protected]>
- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch-early-RFC 00/10] LTTng architecture dependent instrumentation
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86: scale cyc_2_nsec according to CPU frequency
- Previous by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Next by thread: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
- Index(es):
 |