Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]

• To: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
• From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
• Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:43:44 +0100
• Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, Linux-pm mailing list <[email protected]>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tX/hilGECwiSSZZQHXQ+zWwJoI3x/UivnoIdD0rRnSztFiFOFMMioQnrlwwV/rOVgBbx2nQ6bBUWXdHkLKSrDzA6n+DpzBMcpki+54uSF0qHgRZ0pOLOvVKt2aLz9auu7CEAL2X9qYn95lQUGF8ds36S/+FSvcU9hPp+7sW/Bgo=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031)

On 12/08/2007 04:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm wondering why it had no effect now - the new code is in essence a 
> NOP over what we had.

Maybe a dumb question. Why those changes in process_32.c in the patch and not in
process_64.c?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
  • Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?
• Next by Date: Re: lockdep problem conversion semaphore->mutex (dev->sem)
• Previous by thread: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
• Next by thread: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]