> Latency was very > important, so we ended up doing essentially a multicast unix socket > rather than taking the extra penalty for UDP multicast. What extra penalty? Local UDP shouldn't be much more expensive than Unix. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: "Chris Friesen" <[email protected]>
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- References:
- New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: [email protected] (Renzo Davoli)
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: [email protected] (Renzo Davoli)
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- From: "Chris Friesen" <[email protected]>
- New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] old debugging hacks sneaked back
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] swap image signature check upon resume
- Previous by thread: Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- Next by thread: Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- Index(es):
 |