Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detection and directly attempt initialization

Brett Warden wrote:

On Dec 5, 2007 9:37 AM, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:

Although I would suggest that "aggressive" may not be the best term - I'm
not such of a good one however - skip_passive ?


How about force_init?

Much more descriptive.


--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detection and directly attempt initialization
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detection and directly attempt initialization
  - From: "Brett Warden" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] printer port driver: semaphore to mutex
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detection and directly attempt initialization
Next by thread: [PATCH] bw-qcam: Adds module parameter 'aggressive' to skip polite auto-detection prior to direct initialization.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]