Nick Piggin wrote:
After my patch, we can do XIP in a hardsect size < PAGE_SIZE block
device -- this seems to be a fine thing to do at least for the
ramdisk code. Would this situation be problematic for existing drivers,
and if so, in what way?
I have done some archeology, and our ancient CVS logs show this check
was introduced in early 2005 into our 2.6.x. codebase. However, it
existed way before, and was copied from our prehistorical ext2 split
named xip2 back in the old days of 2.4.x where we did not really have
a block device behind because that one was scamped into the file
system in a very queer way.
After all, I don't see any risk in removing the check. The only driver
we have that does direct_access is drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c, and
that one only supports block_size == PAGE_SIZE. I think the patch
should go into mainline.
Acked-by: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
