Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Dec 06, 2007, at 00:30:16, Renzo Davoli wrote:
AF_IPN is different. AF_IPN is the broadcast and peer-to-peer extension of AF_UNIX. It supports communication among *user* processes.

Ok, you say it's different, but then you describe how IP unicast and broadcast work.

Renzo also described something new (in the socket() arena): the multi-reader, multi-writer is just not available in IP.

I wonder if this solves the same problem as d-bus?


So if you really think this is something that belongs in the kernel you need to provide much more detailed descriptions and use-cases for why it cannot be implemented in user-space or with small modifications to existing UDP/TCP networking.

I would strengthen this sentiment: If you think something belongs in the kernel, you need to argue your case (provide much more detailed descriptions and use-cases.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux