On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 23:45 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:27:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if the definition of asmlinkage and prevent_tail_call can
> > > > > be omitted as well and let the linux/linkage.h version get picked up
> > > > > instead.
> > > >
> > > > no, we cannot remove them - asmlinkage is needed for the syscall
> > > > entry (and other entry code) to work, the and the prevent_tail_call
> > > > works around a compiler bug. (which might or might not be fixed in
> > > > latest gcc - but we generally dont remove workarounds unless we are
> > > > really sure it's fine.)
> > >
> > > OK, but if this patch is acceptable, then there is no more places in
> > > the tree that define the FASTCALL macro, other than the empty default
> > > in include/linux/linkage.h. So I think a second step would be to
> > > start to get rid of FASTCALL callers elsewhere in the tree...thoughts?
> >
> > the removal of FASTCALL is fine: the default (and only) compiler model
> > for x86 (32-bit) is regparm(3), so the regparm(3) macro is equivalent to
> > the empty one in linux/linkage.h.
> >...
>
> But please ensure that they stay in assembler code also used by UML.
I'm curious how UML is using FASTCALL/fastcall. Any pointers?
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
