* Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's not the same thing at all. I think that David is suggesting
> that the reinsertion logic should pretend that the task used up all of
> the CPU time it was offered in the slot leading up to the
> sched_yield() call.
we have tried this too, and this has problems too (artificial inflation
of the vruntime metric and a domino effects on other portions of the
scheduler). So this is a worse solution than what we have now. (and this
has all been pointed out in past discussions in which David
participated. I'll certainly reply to any genuinely new idea.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
