Re: Out of tree module using LSM

> Jargon File in all its glory. And if you still think you could look for
> patterns, how about executable code that self-modifies in random ways
> but when executed as a whole actually has the functionality of fetchmail
> embedded within it? How would you guard against that?

Thats a problem for whoever writes the ESR detection tool and to what
level it works. The question for the kernel is how do we provide a
mechanism to allow (to some extent at least) this kind of tool to run.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Jon Masters <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Justin Banks <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Jon Masters <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Out of tree module using LSM
  - From: Jon Masters <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: + proc-fix-the-threaded-proc-self.patch added to -mm tree
Next by Date: Re: [patch -mm 2/4] mqueue namespace : add unshare support
Previous by thread: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
Next by thread: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]