* Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> wrote: > > heh :-) Scheduling isnt hard either - and looking at traces > > (especially with mcount_enabled=1) certainly helps. > > I still don't know what mcount_enabled=1 should do. I didn't see any > difference in the trace after enabling it. if you build with CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACING then you should see a trace of *every* function call done within the kernel. Warning: reading it can be very addictive ;-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- -rt doesn't compile for UML
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] ata: ahci: Enclosure Management via LED
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: cpu accounting controller
- Previous by thread: Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- Next by thread: Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- Index(es):
 |