On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > date-7119 0.... 15636591us!: schedule <bash-502> (0 0) > bash-502 0.... 15643908us!: schedule <date-7119> (0 0) > bash-502 0.... 15646250us!: schedule <date-7120> (0 0) How exactly did you end up getting this data? And is there something I can read to tell what it means? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- References:
- -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- -rt doesn't compile for UML
- Prev by Date: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
- Next by Date: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)
- Previous by thread: Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- Next by thread: Re: scheduling anomaly on uml (was: -rt doesn't compile for UML)
- Index(es):