On Nov 28 2007 16:38, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> And if we are talking about the situation when files are written to
>> in controlled way (i.e. we are not concerned with malware running on
>> the box in question and just want to stop it from passing through
>> mailsewer, etc.), then there's no damn need to play with LSM - just
>> have e.g. coda with its commit-on-close and run the scanner on
>> commit. End of story. Mind you, in such setups one would be much
>> better off just having the mail server run the tests explicitly in
>> the userland, along with the rest of anti-spam, etc. filters.
>
>I've repeated the above statements so many times to a number of the
>anti-virus companies, and other people that really should know better,
>that I'm really sick of it. For some reason, they keep trying to do
>things like this in the kernel, despite it being trivial to do in
>userspace properly.
>
Do you mean something along the lines of FUSE?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
