The real problem is that these drivers are not in the upstream kernel. Are there common reasons why these drivers are not upstream?
One might be that upstream has not accepted them. Anything doing or smelling of TOE comes to mind right away.
rick jones - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- References:
- [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 04/14] ia64: Remove the __SMALL_ADDR_AREA attribute for per cpu access
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 04/14] ia64: Remove the __SMALL_ADDR_AREA attribute for per cpu access
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
- Index(es):
 |