On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:25:33AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > 1) Why is everyone so concerned that export symbol space is large?
> > - does it cost cpu or running memory?
> > - does it cause bugs?
> > - or are you just worried about "evil modules"?
>
> To clarify something here, by "evil", don't necessarily think "binary only".
>
> Out of tree modules are frequently using symbols that they shouldn't be.
> Because they get no peer-review here, they 'get away with it' for the most part.
> Until distro vendors push rebased kernel updates that removed exports that
> should never have been exported, and suddenly people like me get bombed
> with "Fedora broke my xyz driver" mails.
>...
The real problem is that these drivers are not in the upstream kernel.
Are there common reasons why these drivers are not upstream?
> Dave
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
