Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:43:06AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

 > There seems to be rough consensus that the kernel currently has too many 
 > exported symbols. A lot of these exports are generally usable utility 
 > functions or important driver interfaces; but another large part are functions
 > intended by only one or two very specific modules for a very specific purpose.
 > One example is the TCP code. It has most of its internals exported, but 
 > only for use by tcp_ipv6.c (and now a few more by the TCP/IP congestion modules) 
 > But it doesn't make sense to include these exported for a specific module
 > functions into a broader "kernel interface".   External modules assume
 > they can use these functions, but they were never intended for that.
 > 
 > This patch allows to export symbols only for specific modules by 
 > introducing symbol name spaces. A module name space has a white
 > list of modules that are allowed to import symbols for it; all others
 > can't use the symbols.

I really like this patchset.   Definitely a step in the right direction imo.
Looks like some nits there that checkpatch will probably pick up on,
but otherwise, looks very straightforward too.

Kudos.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/