> I like this concept in general; I have one minor comment; right now
> your namespace argument is like
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(foo, some_symbol);
>
> from a language-like pov I kinda wonder if it's nicer to do
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS("foo", some_symbol);
>
> because foo isn't something in C scope, but more a string-like
> identifier...
That wouldn't work for MODULE_ALLOW() because it appends the namespace
to other identifiers. I don't know of a way in the C processor to get
back from a string to a ## concatenable identifier.
For EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS it would be in theory possible, but making
it asymmetric to MODULE_ALLOW would be ugly imho.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
