Ingo Molnar wrote:
i took that "Nope" as referring to my impression - but you in fact meant that i am not wrong? :-) So nothing to see here. single-bzImage initrd was and is possible, so we could in fact move chunks of system-related userland (such as irqbalanced) into the kernel proper?
Yes, it should be quite straightforward. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net
- Next by Date: Re: Posix file capabilities in 2.6.24rc2; now 2.6.24-rc3
- Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Next by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Index(es):
 |