Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?

* Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should 
> just *work* with sensible defaults.  I don't use an initrd, or an 
> initramfs, and have no intention of ever doing so.

nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of 
a bzImage too? Am i wrong?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/18] x86 vDSO: arch/x86/vdso/vdso32
• Next by Date: Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)
• Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
• Next by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]