* Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should > just *work* with sensible defaults. I don't use an initrd, or an > initramfs, and have no intention of ever doing so. nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of a bzImage too? Am i wrong? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- References:
- CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/18] x86 vDSO: arch/x86/vdso/vdso32
- Next by Date: Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)
- Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Next by thread: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
- Index(es):
 |