> This was mentioned in one of my mails. I added the parameter to
> accommodate Linus's and Zack's idea to use the functionality for syslets
> as well. Not really a multiplexer, it is meant to be a "execute
> synchronously or asynchronously" flag. In the latter case an additional
> parameter might be needed to indicate the notification mechanism.
I'm sure the additional parameter will be needed, and it might be pretty
involved. I think the current notion of syslets needs, at the very least:
- a userspace stack and IP to return to after going async
- the completion context when completed async
- a pointer to a return code when completed without blocking
We'll see. I'm working on it.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
