Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] sys_indirect system call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This was mentioned in one of my mails.  I added the parameter to
> accommodate Linus's and Zack's idea to use the functionality for syslets
> as well.  Not really a multiplexer, it is meant to be a "execute
> synchronously or asynchronously" flag.  In the latter case an additional
> parameter might be needed to indicate the notification mechanism.

I'm sure the additional parameter will be needed, and it might be pretty
involved.  I think the current notion of syslets needs, at the very least:

 - a userspace stack and IP to return to after going async
 - the completion context when completed async
 - a pointer to a return code when completed without blocking

We'll see.  I'm working on it.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux