-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I am wondering if some parts are missing from your ChangeLog
>
> You apparently added in v3 a new 'flags' parameter to indirect syscall
> but no trace of this change in Changelog, and why it was added. This
> seems to imply a future multiplexor.
This was mentioned in one of my mails. I added the parameter to
accommodate Linus's and Zack's idea to use the functionality for syslets
as well. Not really a multiplexer, it is meant to be a "execute
synchronously or asynchronously" flag. In the latter case an additional
parameter might be needed to indicate the notification mechanism.
> And no change in the test program reflecting this 'flags' new param, so
> it fails.
Yep, sorry, I didn't update the text by including the most recent test
program. I'll do that for the next version.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHQwca2ijCOnn/RHQRAgQJAKDH+N3+FSJ0kD5VbzbAFN4918wREwCePHbc
nSY/t9x1FuYstYDaaT6Kut0=
=c95e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
