On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:24:59PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote:
> Testing sched-cfs-v2.6.24-rc3-v24.patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3-git1
> (ignored the two "already applied" messages coming from git1 commits),
> I get a 1.00 minimum load in top, coming from the load_balance_mo thread
> staying in D-state. I get this on 2 different computers with similar
> configs, so I am attaching one of them here.
Ingo,
I am reworking the fair-group load balance patches. Can you drop
what you have until I resubmit?
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Prev by Date:
Re: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue
- Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH] - TPM device driver layer (tpm.c|h) - 2nd repost
- Previous by thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Next by thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Index(es):
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
