Re: [PATCH 7/24] consolidate msr.h

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > With PVOPS on it gives compiler warnings without that explict cast.
> > Without looking at the code, IIRC with non-PVOPS it is a macro
> > directly into asm, so it didn't matter what the cast was. But with
> > PVOPS as a function, it gave compiler warnings.
> >
> > Take it out and try compiling it for both i386 and x86_64. One of them
> > gave warnings. But maybe it's not a problem now.
>
> i dont think there's ever any true need (and good cause) to force
> integer type casts like that at the callee site.

I guess the problem is that we converted a macro to a function, where the
macro did no type checking. Now we need to pick between integers and
pointers. Some places uses intergers in wrmsrl and some use pointers. So
changing this to a typechecking protocol is not going to be nice.

Looking at the current code now, we have this:

====
	checking_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, (u64)__KERNEL_CS);
	checking_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, 0ULL);
	checking_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP, (u64)ia32_sysenter_target);

	wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, ia32_cstar_target);
====

A typecast is already used in that same area.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/