Re: [stable] [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:02:42PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 2.6.22-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let 
> > us know.
> 
> we shouldnt do this for 2.6.22 - it has no proper cpu_clock() facility 
> like .23 or .24. So lets leave this alone.

Ok, I've now dropped it, thanks for letting us know.

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 04/26] writeback: dont propagate AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE
• Next by Date: Re: Posix file capabilities in 2.6.24rc2; now 2.6.24-rc3
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Next by thread: [patch 08/26] Fix TEQL oops.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]