Re: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

* Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2.6.22-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let 
> us know.

we shouldnt do this for 2.6.22 - it has no proper cpu_clock() facility 
like .23 or .24. So lets leave this alone.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [stable] [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Keep UML Kconfig in sync with x86
Next by Date: Re: regression from softlockup fix
Previous by thread: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
Next by thread: Re: [stable] [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]