Re: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

* Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2.6.22-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let 
> us know.

we shouldnt do this for 2.6.22 - it has no proper cpu_clock() facility 
like .23 or .24. So lets leave this alone.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Keep UML Kconfig in sync with x86
• Next by Date: Re: regression from softlockup fix
• Previous by thread: [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] [patch 07/26] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]