On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:15:48 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 8:18 PM, Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:44 +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 share the same dentry_iput and so share the same
> > > unlink and sillyrename logic.
> > > But they do not share nfs_init_server()!
> > >
> > > I wonder why this doesn't blow up more violently, but only hangs...
> > >
> > > But as I don't know if it is correct to add the workqueue
> > > initialization to nfs4_init_server() or remove the nfs_sb_active /
> > > nfs_sb_deactive for the NFSv4 case, I can't offer a patch to fix this.
> > >
> > > Torsten
> >
> > I had already fixed that one in my own stack. Attached are the 3 patches
> > that I've got. 1 from SteveD, 2 fixes.
> >
>
> Moving the init_waitqueue_head() like patch
> linux-2.6.24-006-fix_to_fix_sillyrename_bug_on_umount.dif and applying
> linux-2.6.24-007-fix_nfs_free_unlinkdata.dif lets my testcase work.
> Also lockdep no longer complains about the non-static key.
>
Thanks.
To avoid goofups, could you please send the full fix against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
