* Micah Dowty <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am a bit at a loss as to how this could relate to the patch. This
> > looks like a load balance logic issue that causes the load
> > calculation to go wrong?
>
> My best guess is that this has something to do with the timing with
> which we sample the CPU's instantaneous load when calculating the load
> averages.. but I still understand only the basics of the scheduler and
> SMP balancer. All I really know for sure at this point regarding your
> patch is that git-bisect found it for me.
hm, your code uses timeouts for this, right? The CPU load average that
is used for SMP load balancing is sampled from the scheduler tick - and
has been sampled from the scheduler tick for eons. v2.6.23 defaulted to
a different method but v2.6.24 samples it from the tick again. So my
guess is, your testcode behave similarly on 2.6.22 too, correct?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
