From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:49:37 -0800 (PST)
> Well there is an LWN article now that also claims that the cpu_alloc
> patchset requires a large bss space. Sigh. See
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/257828/
>
> Not true! 44 bytes is reasonable.
Well, the first version of the patch set, the one I tested, did
require a lot of BSS space. And that's the one they are writing
about.
I don't see how you can even remotely claim that LWN's reporting is
inaccurate here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
