Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86&x86-64 support for sys_indirect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
\>> +     sys_call_table[INDIRECT_SYSCALL(regs)->eax] ((regs)->ebx,
(regs)->ecx, \
>                                              ^^^^^-> I take it that ->eax is wrong here? 

Yep, my bad.  I've retired the 32-bit machines around here.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHPKcp2ijCOnn/RHQRAjqMAKCLra+KisV6inTbPrbLtqruDVKyxACgxRLf
kFDyFNbnhqyj3MUkmzV0S2o=
=HQcV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux