Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86&x86-64 support for sys_indirect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> \>> +     sys_call_table[INDIRECT_SYSCALL(regs)->eax] ((regs)->ebx,
> (regs)->ecx, \
> >                                              ^^^^^-> I take it that ->eax is wrong here? 
> 
> Yep, my bad.  I've retired the 32-bit machines around here.

weird - i built it on 32-bit and it should have failed the build?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux