On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce the users problem with the hardware I have. And
> without the patch the dual port board doesn't work. So it is a question
> of regression, versus fixing pre-existing bugs.
Yeah. Five years ago I might have said that it's important to fix
pre-existing bugs, but all the ACPI and suspend etc problems have long
since convinced me that regressions are *much* more important than stuff
that never worked.
> I am okay with reverting the patch, as a temporary state, but concerned
> with how to make progress in fixing this.
Well, the original bug-report did contain a suggested workaround too.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
