[PATCH] time: fix typo that makes sync_cmos_clock erratic

["David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com>]

Fix a typo in ntp.c that has caused updating of the persistent (RTC)
clock when synced to NTP to behave erratically.

When debugging a freeze that arises on my AMD64 machines when I
run the ntpd service, I added a number of printk's to monitor the
sync_cmos_clock procedure.  I discovered that it was not syncing to
cmos RTC every 11 minutes as documented, but instead would keep trying
every second for hours at a time.  The reason turned out to be a typo
in sync_cmos_clock, where it attempts to ensure that
update_persistent_clock is called very close to 500 msec. after a 1
second boundary (required by the PC RTC's spec). That typo referred to
"xtime" in one spot, rather than "now", which is derived from "xtime"
but not equal to it.  This makes the test erratic, creating a
"coin-flip" that decides when update_persistent_clock is called - when
it is called, which is rarely, it may be at any time during the one
second period, rather than close to 500 msec, so the value written is
needlessly incorrect, too.

Signed-off-by: David P. Reed

---
I have thoroughly tested this on several x86_64 machines, and also
on one 32-bit machine.  I have also submitted a patch to fix the
freeze cited above, but both patches are independent, and should be
treated separately.

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/ntp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/ntp.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/ntp.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned lon
 		return;

 	getnstimeofday(&now);
-	if (abs(xtime.tv_nsec - (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) <= tick_nsec / 2)
+	if (abs(now.tv_nsec - (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) <= tick_nsec / 2)
 		fail = update_persistent_clock(now);

 	next.tv_nsec = (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2) - now.tv_nsec;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/