On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
After some bisection pain (sg broken in the middle and XFS not
compiling in other places) the regression seems to be:
commit 051e7cd44ab8f0f7c2958371485b4a1ff64a8d1b
Author: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:58:24 2007 +1000
Following a git-bisect howto[0], I tried to revert this commit:
# git checkout master
# git revert 051e7cd44ab8f0f7c2958371485b4a1ff64a8d1b
Auto-merged fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
Auto-merged fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.h
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.h
Auto-merged fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c
Auto-merged fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.h
Auto-merged fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c
Auto-merged fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c
Auto-merged fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
Automatic revert failed. After resolving the conflicts,
mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' and commit the result.
Any ideas?
Christian
[0] is this still up-to-date?
http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/v1.4.4.4/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt
--
BOFH excuse #423:
It's not RFC-822 compliant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]