On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and
> > send them to the [email protected] address so we can apply them
> > properly?
>
> I'm a bit confused. The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386.
> Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?
Was this second series a new set, or a different one? I was assuming
they were new patches, and that they too needed to be applied.
These patches were sent against the merged x86 tree, not the -stable
tree with i386.
> > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
> >
>
> To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
> released 2.6.23 kernel. But it isn't screamingly urgent.
Ok, that's fine, but can you send some patches that I can apply? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
