Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24

Greg KH wrote:
> Yeah, but you cc:ed all 12 patches to stable@.  The majority of which we
> don't want to take, right?  Which specific ones should stable@ care
> about?

Crap, sorry about that.  I'd just intended to send the overview and the
four patches, which have explicit CC: stable lines in the patch
descriptions.  They are:

Subject: [PATCH 06/12] xen: add batch completion callbacks
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] xen: deal with stale cr3 values when unpinning
pagetables
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] xen: fix incorrect vcpu_register_vcpu_info
hypercall argument
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: eagerly remove vmap mappings to avoid
upsetting Xen

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: What still uses the block layer?
• Next by Date: Re: [Linux-usb-users] OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop...
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]