Greg KH wrote:
> Yeah, but you cc:ed all 12 patches to stable@. The majority of which we
> don't want to take, right? Which specific ones should stable@ care
> about?
Crap, sorry about that. I'd just intended to send the overview and the
four patches, which have explicit CC: stable lines in the patch
descriptions. They are:
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] xen: add batch completion callbacks
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] xen: deal with stale cr3 values when unpinning
pagetables
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] xen: fix incorrect vcpu_register_vcpu_info
hypercall argument
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: eagerly remove vmap mappings to avoid
upsetting Xen
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
