On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:24:36 +1100 Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > I was hoping that after the round of release-and-review which Stephane,
> > Andi and I did about twelve months ago that we were on track to merge the
> > perfmon codebase as-offered. But now it turns out that the sentiment is
> > that the code simply has too many bells-and-whistles to be acceptable.
>
> Whose sentiment?
Andi and hch, maybe others I've forgotten about.
> I've had a bit of a look at it today together with David Gibson. Our
> impression is that the latest version is a lot cleaner and simpler
> than it used to be. I'm also reading Stephane's technical report
> which describes the interface, and whilst I'm only part-way through
> it, I haven't seen anything yet which strikes me as unnecessary or
> overly complicated.
Yes, that's quite possible. I don't know how up-to-date people's
knowledge is. I know I haven't looked seriously at the code in around
twelve months.
Let's get it on the wires as outlined and take a look at it all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
