Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:47:45AM -0800, Philip Mucci wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Well, I can say the mood here at supercomputing'07 is pretty somber in 
> regards to the latest exchange of messages regarding the perfmon patches. 

"somber"?

Why?

We (a number of the kernel developers) want to see the perfmon code make
it into the kernel tree, unfortunatly, in the current state it is in,
that's not going to happen.

Andi specified a way that this can happen, just refactor your patches
into smaller bits that can be reviewed and applied.

If you, or anyone else has any questions about this, please let us know.
So far, I have not seen any response to his message, so I'm guessing
that the perfmon developers either are off working on this, or don't
care.

And if they don't care, then yes, I agree with your "somber" feeling...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux