On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> >...
> > There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the
> > classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one
> > of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM
> > community looks for ARM bugs in bugzilla.
> >
> > Let's not forget that it would be a waste of time for people to manually
> > check bugzilla for ARM bugs. There's soo few people reporting ARM bugs
> > into bugzilla that a weekly manual check by every maintainer would just
> > return the same old boring results for months and months at a time.
> >...
>
> What about having all ARM bugs in Bugzilla by default assigned to
> [email protected]? [1]
That would also work, probably much better than setting up yet another
list.
My experience of trying to get mbligh to do this when I stopped looking
after PCMCIA stuff was *extremely* painful. Wonder if it's become any
easier of late?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
