Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:36:56PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8
> core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2,
> comparing slab vs slub allocators.

Damn your misleading subject! I thought this was going to be about
something interesting.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]