Bernd Strieder wrote:
I managed to get it running with the SuSE kernel when passing
adma=0 to sata_nv module, and I managed to get it running when
passing mem=2000M to the SuSE kernel. Thanks to Robert for those
hints.
The vanilla kernels I tried 2.6.23.1 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10 (with
patch to sata_nv.c from Robert Hancock see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351451) seem to be
very sensitive in this area. Whenever I got them to oops, I did
not have much time to get anything read on the screen.
I managed under the patched 2.6.24-rc1-git10 to manually load
sata_nv and sr_mod, and then I got an OOps like
Unable to handle ... NULL pointer dref at 0000000000000000 RIP
ffffff880edf6a
.....
libata:ata_qc_prep + 0xe2/0x15b
.....
srmod:sr_probe
Which patch is this using, the original one from Nov. 2 or the updated
one from Nov. 10? The original one has a bug.
I have attached 3 dmesg outputs with the openSuSE 10.3 kernel and
extracts of /var/log/messages, especially some Oopses. The oopses
from the vanilla kernels seem to be so bad that they do never end
up in a file.
I will do some more tests as soon as possible. I have attached the
files as I created them, you will have to diff the single files,
anyway, to get the important information out, I cannot select for
you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]