Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 03:47:02AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> > As discussed in another thread the right thing is to add a generic solution
> > to select between 32 and 64 bit - useable for powerpc, s390, ppc et al.
> 
> Could you please point me to this discussion?

It starts with this post from Jeff Garzik:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/9/274

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] voyager: fix smp init sections
• Next by Date: [RFC/PATCH] Export force_sig_info
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Fix CONFIG_SMP=n build error on ppc64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]