Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86

Hi,

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> As discussed in another thread the right thing is to add a generic solution
> to select between 32 and 64 bit - useable for powerpc, s390, ppc et al.

Could you please point me to this discussion?
Thanks.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1
• Next by Date: [PATCH] core dump: remain dumpable
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]