Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86

Hi,

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> As discussed in another thread the right thing is to add a generic solution
> to select between 32 and 64 bit - useable for powerpc, s390, ppc et al.

Could you please point me to this discussion?
Thanks.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1
Next by Date: [PATCH] core dump: remain dumpable
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] introduce K64BIT=y and backward compatibility ARCH={i386,x86_64} for x86
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]