> Ugh, I thought the preallocation was getting freed elsewhere, but it > looks like I was wrong. We can't just skip the i_mutex after all, > sorry. Ah, so none of those tests at the top will stop tail packing if there's been pre-allocation? Like, uh, the inode reference count test? - z [ worried, and leaving it in your capable hands ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- References:
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- Prev by Date: Re: x86_64 SATA DVD drive + libata trouble
- Next by Date: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- Previous by thread: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- Next by thread: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
- Index(es):
 |