Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]


Your reasoning makes sense.
But it may be not adapted for applications like apache.

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
  - From: ciol <[email protected]>
- Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: follow_hugetlb_page for write access
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h
Previous by thread: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Next by thread: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]