[poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:

* Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?

* Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who want or just have a new hardware?

* Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)



[1] http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2007/03/03/T19_15_26/


(I'm going to ask this for several projects, not only the kernel)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux