Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

ciol wrote:

Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:

* Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?

* Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who want or just have a new hardware?

* Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)

Why are you asking the developers?  We do this for the sake of the users.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
    • From: ciol <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
    • From: ciol <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] r8169 fix regression on ASUS motherboards (updated again)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] spi: Fix double-free on spi_unregister_master
• Previous by thread: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
• Next by thread: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]