Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg

FYI, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests has details on the
ptrace-tests suite we're collecting.  A test I added there is how I noticed
the PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA regression.  A regression test for the ebp bug
should be easy to add too.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
• Next by Date: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]