Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg

FYI, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests has details on the
ptrace-tests suite we're collecting.  A test I added there is how I noticed
the PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA regression.  A regression test for the ebp bug
should be easy to add too.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
  - From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
  - From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
  - From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
Next by Date: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]